Valor econômico e determinantes socioculturais dos produtos florestais não madeireiros na Reserva Transnacional W da Biosfera, Benim
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3345131Palavras-chave:
produtos florestais não-madeireiros, valor econômico, Oeste AfricanoResumo
Este trabalho examina o valor econômico dos produtos florestais não madeireiros e sua contribuição para a renda da população que reside na Reserva Transnacional W da Biosfera em Benim. No estudo, 148 pessoas de dois grupos étnicos foram entrevistadas. Os dados foram analisados com base no método de estimativa indireta de custo de oportunidade e margem bruta. Os resultados mostram que a população local colhe cinco tipos de produtos: lenha (não comercializado) e quatro produtos comercializados (Vitellaria paradoxa, C.F.Gaertn, sementes e polpa de Parkia biglobosa (Jacq.) R. Br. ex G. Don e folhas de Adansonia digitata L.). A média da contribuição dos produtos comercializados dentre os entrevistados foi estimada em XOF 255,484 ($US 510.968) (desvio padrão: XOF 37,109), representando cerca de 11,46% da renda anual dos domicílios. Grupos de idade e aspectos sociolinguísticos foram os maiores determinantes da exploração de produtos florestais não madeireiros. Tendo em vista o valor desses produtos para as comunidades, deve-se priorizar a domesticação e conservação as plantas identificadas neste estudo.
Referências
Adesina AA; Baidu-Forson J. 1995. Farmers' perceptions and adoption of new agricultural technology: evidence from analysis in Burkina Faso and Guinea, West Africa. Agricultural Economics (13) 1: 1-9.
Ambrose-Oji B. 2003. The contribution of NTFPs to the livelihoods of the ‘forest poor’: evidence from the tropical forest zone of south-west Cameroon. Forest. Rev., (5) 2: 106-117.
Appiah M; Blay D; Damnyag L; Dwomoh FK; Pappinen A; Luukkanen, O. Dependence on forest resources and tropical deforestation in Ghana. Environment, Development and Sustainability, vol .11, n. 3, p. 471-487, 2009.
Arnold JEM; Pérez MR. Can non-timber forest products match tropical forest conservation and development objectives? Ecol. Econ., vol. 39, n.3, p.437-447, 2001.
Bahuguna VK. Forests in the Economy of the Rural Poor: An Estimation of the Dependency Level. AMBIO, vol. 29, n. 3, p. 126-129, 2000.
Baidu-Forson J. Factors influencing adoption of land-enhancing technology in the Sahel: lessons from a case study in Niger. Agricultural Economics 20, 231–239, 1999.
Biloso A; Lejoly J. Etude de l’exploitation et du marché des produitsforestiers non ligneux à Kinshasa. Tropicultura, vol, 24, n.3, p. 183-188, 2006.
Boussard J-M. Economie de l’Agriculture. Ed. ECONOMICA, 1987.
Camou-Guerrero A; Reyes-García V; Martínez-Ramos M; Casas A. Knowledge and Use Value of Plant Species in a Rarámuri Community: A Gender Perspective for Conservation. Hum. Ecol., vol. 36, n.2, p. 259-272, 2008.
Case RJ; Pauli GF; Soejarto DD. Factors in Maintaining Indigenous Knowledge among Ethnic Communities of Manus Island. Econ.Bot. vol. 59, n.4, p. 356-365, 2005.
Cavendish W. Quantitative methods for estimating the economic value of resource use to rural households. In: Campell BM; Luckert ML. (Orgs). Uncovering the Hidden Harvest: Valuation Methods for woodland and Forest Resource. Earthscan, London, 2002, p. 17-63.
Chopra K. The Value of Non-Timber Forest Products: An Estimation for Tropical Deciduous Forests in India. Econ.Bot. vol. 47, n. 3, p.251-257, 1993.
West African (SUN) within the Laboratory of Applied Ecology (LEA). I would like to extend my gratitude to Dr. Afio Zannou, Dr. Valentin Kindomihou, Ir. Gildas Adjovi (M.Sc) and two anonymous reviewers.
C. Increased isolation of two biosphere reserves and surrounding protected areas (WAP ecological complex, West Africa). J. Nat. Conserv.,vol. 15, n. 1, p. 26-40, 2007.
Codjia J; Assogbadjo A; Ekué M. Diversité et valorisation au niveau local des ressources végétales forestières alimentaires du Bénin. Cah. Agric., vol. 12, n. 5, p. 321-331, 2003.
Dagnelie P. Statistiques théoriques et appliquées. De Boeck et Larcier, Bruxelles, Belgium, 1998.
Dalle SP; Potvin C. Conservation of Useful Plants: An Evaluation of Local Priorities from Two Indigenous Communities in Eastern Panama. Econ. Bot., vol. 58, n. 1, p. 38-57, 2004.
Ecosystèmes Protégés en Afrique Soudano-Sahélienne, ECOPAS, 2005. Parc régional W: Un parc, trois pays. [online]
URL: http://www.parc-w.net/en/html/savoir-plus-present-genese.html.
Fandohan B; Assogbadjo AE; Kakaï RG; Kyndt T; Sinsin B. Quantitative morphological descriptors confirm traditionally classified morphotypes of Tamarindus indica L. Fruits. Res. Crop Evol. vol. 58, n.2, p. 299-309, 2011.
Fandohan B; Assogbadjo AE; Kakaï RG; Kyndt T; De Caluwé E; Codjia JTC; Sinsin B. Women’s Traditional Knowledge, Use Value, and the Contribution of Tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) to Rural Households’ Cash Income in Benin. Econ.Bot., vol. 64, n. 3, p. 248-259, 2010.
FAO Forestry, 1999. Towards a harmonized definition of non-wood forest products. Unasylva, 50 (198), 63-64. [online] URL: http://www.fao.org/docrep/x2450e/x2450e0d.htm
Gemedo-Dalle T; Maass BL; Isselstein J. Plant Biodiversity and Ethnobotany of Borana Pastoralists in Southern Oromia, Ethiopia. Econ.Bot., vol. 59, n. 1, p. 43-65, 2005.
Gopalakrishnan C; Wickramasinghe WAR; Gunatilake HM; Prabodh I. Estimating the demand for non-timber forest products among rural communities: a case study from the Sinharaja Rain Forest region, Sri Lanka. Agroforest.Syst.,vol. 65, n. 1, p. 13-22, 2004.
Gunatilak HM; Senaratne DMAH; Abeygunawardena P. The Role of Non-Timber Forest Products in the Economy of Peripheral Communities of Knuckles National Wilderness Area of Sri Lanka: A Farming System Approach. Econ.Bot.,vol. 47, n. 3, p. 275-281, 1993.
Hanazaki, N; Tamashiro JY; Leitão-Filho HF; Begossi A. Diversity of Plant Uses in Two Caiçara Communities from the Atlantic Forest Coast. Brazil.Biodiv.Conserv., vol. 9, n. 5, p. 597-615, 2000.
IIED. Economic Evaluation of Tropical Forest Land Use Options: A Review of Methodology and Applications. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), London, 1994.
Institut National de Statistique Appliquée et Economie, INSAE. Troisième recensement général de la population et de l’habitation (RGPH3). 2002.
Kant S. Integration of Biodiversity Conservation in Tropical Forest and Economic Development of Local Communities.J. Sust. Forest.,vol. 4, n. 1-2, p. 33-62, 1997.
Kramer RA; Sharma N; Munasinghe M. Valuing Tropical Forests-Methodology and Case Study of Madagascar. World Bank Publications, vol. 13, 1995.
Kusters K. Non-timber forest product trade. A trade-off between conservation and development. Assessing the outcomes of non-timber forest product trade on livelihoods and the environment, with special emphasis on the dammar agroforests in Sumatra, Indonesia. Ph.D, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 2009.
Lawrence A; Oliver L. Local values for harvested forest plants in Madre de Dios, Peru: towards a more contextualised interpretation of quantitative ethnobotanical data. Biodiv.Conserv., vol. 14, n.1, p. 45-79, 2005.
Lebel F; Debailleul G; Samba AN ; Olivier A. La contribution des produits forestiers non-ligneux à l’économie des ménages de la région de Thiès, au Sénégal. 2ème atelier régional sur les aspects socio-économiques de l’agroforesterie au Sahel. 2002.
Müller-Schwarze NK. Antes and Hoy Día: Plant Knowledge and Categorization as Adaptations to Life in Panama in the Twenty-First Century. Econ. Bot., vol. 60, n.4, p. 321-334, 2006.
Ndoye O; Ruiz Pérez M; Eyebe A. Les marchés des produits forestiers non ligneux dans la zone de forêt humide du Cameroun. Réseau Foresterie pour le développement rural, ODI, RDFN Paper n. 22c, 1998.
Pearce DW. The economic value of forest ecosystems. Ecosystem health, vol. 7, n. 4, p. 284-296, 2001.
Rahman S. Environmental impacts of modern agricultural technology diffusion in Bangladesh: an analysis of farmers’ perceptions and their determinants. Journal of Environmental Management 68: 183–191, 2003.
Sadoulet E; De-Janvry. The profit function approach to supply and factor demand. In Quantitative Development Policy Analysis. The John Hopkins University Press Baltimore and London, 1995.
Shackleton S; Gumbo D. Contribution of non-wood forest products to livelihoods and poverty alleviation. EN Chidumayo and DJ Gumbo, ed, 2010, p. 63-92.
Svarrer K; Olsen CS. The Economic Value of Non-Timber Forest Products- A Case Study from Malaysia. J.Sust. Forest., vol. 20, n.1, p. 17-41, 2005.
Vodouhê F; Coulibaly O; Greene C; Sinsin B. Estimating the Local Value of Non-Timber Forest Products to Pendjari Biosphere Reserve Dwellers in Benin. Econ. Bot., vol. 63, n.4, 397-412, 2009.
Vodouhê F; Coulibaly O; Sinsin B. Parkia biglobosa (Jacq.) R. Br. ex Benth. harvesting as a tool for conservation and source of income for local people in Pendjari Biosphere Reserve. Acta Bot. Gallica, vol. 158, n.4, p. 595-608, 2011.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Espinhaço
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
