Argumentation in chemistry teacher education: Past, present and future opportunities
Keywords:
Argumentation, Science education, Teacher education, Chemistry teachingAbstract
This article reports the results of a thesis about argumentation in Colombian chemistry teacher education. Firstly, literature review is discussed in order to determine how research advances in argumentation and science education are involved –or are not- into training Colombian chemistry teacher programs. Secondly, types of questions employed by three pre-service chemistry teachers are analyzed to understand how they provoke –or do not- students’ argumentation. Finally, the results of this study permit to suggest a program to educate future chemistry teacher based on how to enrich students’ learning through argumentation.
References
Adúriz-Bravo, A. (2014). Revisiting school scientific argumentation from the perspective of the history and philosophy of science. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.). International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching (pp. 1443-1472). Dordrecht: Springer.
Archila, P. A. (2012). La investigación en argumentación y sus implicaciones en la formación inicial de profesores de ciencias. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 9(3), 361-375.
Archila, P. A. (2014a). Are science teachers prepared to promote argumentation? A case study with pre-service teachers in Bogotá city. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 15(1), 1-21.
Archila, P. A. (2014b). Argumentación y educación en ciencias: vínculos con la alfabetización y la cultura científica. In A, Molina. (Ed.). Enseñanza de las ciencias y cultura: múltiples aproximaciones (pp. 103-121). Bogotá: Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas.
Archila, P. A. (2014c). Comment enseigner et apprendre chimie par l’argumentation? Saarbrücken: Éditions Universitaires Européennes.Blosser, P. E. (1973). Handbook of effective questioning techniques. Worthington: Education Associates.
Buty, C., & Plantin, C. (Eds.). (2008). Argumenter en classe de sciences. Du débat à l’apprentissage. Paris: Institut national de recherche pédagogique.
Díaz de Bustamante, J., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2000). Communication in the laboratory sessions and sequences of arguments. In I. Garcia-Rodeja, J. Diaz, U. Harms, & M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.). Proceedings 3rd Conference of European Researchers in Didactic of Biology (pp. 247-260). Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.
Erduran, S., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (Eds.). (2007). Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research. New York: Springer.
Geelan, D. (2012). Teacher Explanations. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin., & C. McRobbie (Eds.). Second international handbook of science education (pp. 9871000). Dordrecht: Springer.
Hegarty-Hazel, E. (1990). The student laboratory and the science curriculum: An overview. In E. Hegarty-Hazel (Ed.). The student laboratory and the science curriculum (pp. 3-26). London: Routledge.
Khine, M. S. (Ed.). (2012). Perspectives on Scientific Argumentation: Theory, Practice and Research. Dordrecht: Springer.
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Reigosa, C. (2006). Contextualizing practices across epistemic levels in the chemistry laboratory. Science Education, 90, 707-733.
Lemke, J. (2012). Analyzing Verbal Data: Principles, Methods, and Problems. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin., & C. McRobbie (Eds.). Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1471-1484). Dordrecht: Springer.
Mcneill, K. L., & Pimentel, D. S. (2010). Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation. Science Education, 94(2), 203-229.
Mortimer, E., & Machado, A. (2001). Elaboração de conflitos e anomalias na sala de aula. In E.F. Mortimer., & A.L.B. Smolka. (Orgs.). Linguagem, cultura e cognição: reflexões para o ensino e a sala de aula. (pp. 107-138). Belo Horizonte: Autêntica.
Muller, N., & Perret-Clermont, A. (Eds.). (2009). Argumentation and education: Theoretical Foundations and Practices. New York: Springer.
Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463-466.
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argument in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 9941020.
Plantin, C. (1998). La interacción argumentativa. Escritos. Revista del Centro de Ciencias del Lenguaje, 18, 23-49.
Plantin, C. (2004). Pensar el debate. Revista Signos, 37(55), 121-129.
Plantin, C. (2005). L’argumentation; histoire, théories et perspectives. Paris: PUF.
Sadler, T. (Ed.). (2011). Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research. New York: Springer.
Schwarz, B. B., Perret-Clermont, A-N., Trognon, A., & Marro, P. (2008). Learning processes within and between successive activities in a laboratory context. Pragmatics and Cognition, 16(1), 57-87.
Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 27(2-3), 235-260.
Stipcich, M., Islas, M., & Domínguez, A. (2006). El Lugar de la Argumentación en la Formación de Profesores de Ciencias. Revista chilena de educación científica, 6(1), 67-74.
Xie, Q., & So, W. (2012). Understanding and practice of argumentation: A pilot study with Mainland Chinese pre-service teachers in secondary science classrooms. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 13(2), 1-20.
Zohar, A. (2007). Science Teacher Education and Professional Development. In S. Erduran., & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre. (Eds.). Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 245-268). New York: Springer.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
A Revista proporciona acesso público - Open Access - a todo seu conteúdo protegidos pela Licença Creative Commons (CC-BY).
